Famous MNC’s like Apple, Facebook, and Google Have Lost the Monopoly Argument

These companies future once decided by messianic entrepreneurs (assisted by venture capitalists and assorted Silicon Valley boosters) pumping out their sermons to rapt crowds in cavernous arenas and Now it’s the fastier crew of competition regulators and policy wonks – more commonly spotted in carpeted conference rooms – who appear to have seized the pulpit now.

The Famous Investors in Apple, Facebook, and Alphabet will no doubt testify to this shift in power after the threat of US antitrust action caused their shares to fall at the start of this week (Apple’s have rallied slightly).

Once there was a great show of purpose from the attendees at an OECD trust-buster gathering that I attended in Paris on Monday, which helped no doubt by the Americans finally starting to follow Europe’s lead in tackling the tech giants’ monopolistic tendencies. Margrethe Vestager, the EU’s top competition official and lined up with officials from the US Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, as well as top regulators from Britain, France and Germany, to offer pointers about what lies in store for the industry.

If looking back over five-year tenure that resulted in three fines against Google, admitted: “We could have been faster.”

As we know, Fail and Regret is a powerful thing, especially when the political pressure to act is rising. as we take example of Instagram was frequently referred to as something that flew under everyone’s radar: Its sale to Facebook for $1 billion was waved through in 2012, largely because it had a handful of staff, earned no revenue and was to be kept at arm’s length. The fact that Instagram is now a behemoth in its own right has woken up regulators to the need to take a tougher line on big tech gobbling up promising startups.

Do you know that Instagram had 30 million users at the time Facebook acquired it. Now, it has more than 1 billion. Crucially, Instagram shares vast amounts of user data with its parent network, a practice that drew objections from German regulators earlier this year. In the year 2012, though, there were few concerns: U.K. competition watchdogs wrote at the time that most third parties “did not believe that photo apps are attractive to advertisers,” citing the fact that “limited” user data was captured.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, it’s not his fault that he had a more acute grasp of Instagram’s potential, but this shouldn’t stop the market cops from trying to up their game to avoid even more social media power ending up in one man’s hands.

How many other Instagrams have flown under the radar? It’s hard to say. Andrea Coscelli, head of the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority, estimates that Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google and Microsoft have together bought close to 250 companies in the past five years. For every big-budget acquisition like Facebook’s WhatsApp deal, there are several like “tbh,” a teen social network bought by Zuckerberg in 2017 and quietly shut down afterwards.

There’s a feeling among regulators that startups aren’t really being given the chance to grow and compete – they get bought as soon as they enter Big Tech’s “kill zone” (where promising potential rivals are simply taken out). Expect more of a push to tackle this practice, such as by lowering the burden of evidence required to identify potential anti-competitive harm from a takeover.

So the smart money’s still on Europe taking the more adventurous and aggressive antitrust measures. But there’s no ignoring the shift on both sides of the Atlantic. People want tougher rules, and they will come.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s